lupestripe: (Default)
lupestripe ([personal profile] lupestripe) wrote2010-02-10 03:14 pm

Alastair Campbell On Loose Women

Did anyone see this yesterday? It was one of the most bizarre interviews I have ever seen. The man famed for having a brutal no-nonsense reputation being grilled by Colleen Nolan.

Effectively, it was just a 15 minute party political broadcast for the Labour Party (I don't know whether it contravenes ITV regulations or not - as it's independent I doubt it) but it was a combination of hard political talk, the Iraq war and ephemeral fluffy bullshit. He had the temerity to blast the Press over the Iraq Inquiry and their changing positions between 2002 and 2010 (which we all heard on The Andrew Marr Show on Sunday) but he also blasted celebrity culture when he quite clearly precipitated it in politics. The fact that he was on such a show as Loose Women demonstrates this yet further.

The interview ended with "and after the break, we find out whether you should be upset if your man doesn't know your eye colour or bra size". It was surreal.

I'm very unsure about politicians going on such fluffy shows anyway but I guess it does appeal to the electorate. Whether questions of impartiality are brought up though I am uncertain. Is such undue influence fair from a national broadcaster or is it just the same as the national press and their differing political allegiances? The problem is that the press is far easier to avoid than TV as most people invite the latter into their homes. You can always turn over but once you see something, there is a temptation to stick with it and hear it out.

[identity profile] simbab.livejournal.com 2010-02-10 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
The interview ended with "and after the break, we find out whether you should be upset if your man doesn't know your eye colour or bra size". It was surreal.

That, that really does sound like a Monty Python sketch. I can just hear Michael Palin (puffyhaired '70s version) saying that.

[identity profile] simbab.livejournal.com 2010-02-10 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
With some outrageous leisure suit on, too, lol.

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
What kind of leisure suit?

[identity profile] simbab.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Dunno, this might be a good start.

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Lols indeed :)

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Lols, sadly it was very real. It's what passes for politics over here these days.

[identity profile] alexf0x.livejournal.com 2010-02-10 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I just wondered if the viewers of something like loose women really care about someone like campbell really? I would of thought that they would be more interested in the stuff about bra sizes. It's not exactly a high brow politics show like question time.

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
He was promoting a book - I think they may be interested in that. I don't know, I think the average viewers of Loose Women probably are interested in politics. I imagine them to be the chattering middle class types. I doubt the people who watch Loose Women watch Question Time so perhaps he's just tapping into a different section of the electorate.

[identity profile] shep-shepherd.livejournal.com 2010-02-10 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps NuLab think that their core vote routinely watches such pap? I wonder if we'll see Bruin on the Jeremy Kyle Show before the general election?
Edited 2010-02-10 17:27 (UTC)

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
I don't imagine David Cameron would do much different given the opportunity though.

[identity profile] simbab.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
OMG THEY'RE BOTH THE SAME PARTY.

Over here, we usually get that line from the libertarian/tinfoil hat/goldbug types, as well as the Ralph Nader crowd. Basically the stupid and paranoid on the left and right. It's sort of true, in sentiment at least, but the Republicans over here are bugfuck insane, and given the dynamics of the party system over here, a vote for a third party is (in effect) a vote for the Republicans (as it siphons off Democratic votes).

So, if you understand and accept that, saying that the Democrats are the same party as the Republicans, and implying they're not worth your vote, sets of some alarm bells in some people—I guesss you'd better follow that up with "thus I am staying home (and not voting)" or you're going to be seen as a kook.

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
The UK system is slightly different, of course, but basically the two main parties are battling over the centre ground. The left wing party (Labour) are now right wing and the Conservative party are more right. In fact, it probably reflects US politics quite well at the moment.

[identity profile] slinkat.livejournal.com 2010-02-10 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem Campbell has is anyone even remotely interested in politics simply will not believe a word he says any more. The fluffier and more sincere politicians become, the less I trust them, and let's face it, I'm starting fairly low on the trust-o-meter in the first place.

Footnote - Brown really doesn't look well does he?

[identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com 2010-02-11 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
Brown looks dreadfully ill. I think the PM job does age you dreadfully. Did anyone believe what Campbell said? He hardly had the best of reputations from day one.