lupestripe (
lupestripe) wrote2008-09-16 12:25 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"The Furry Elite"
At Eurofurence, I heard this phrase mentioned for the first time.
Does a furry elite exist or is it merely a perception?
Does it consist of furs who just happen to be good at what they do - be it performing, drawing or writing - and who are appreciated because of it?
Or is it just a term made up by some who are slightly envious of their current situation and who are desperate to be appreciated themselves?
Does a furry elite exist or is it merely a perception?
Does it consist of furs who just happen to be good at what they do - be it performing, drawing or writing - and who are appreciated because of it?
Or is it just a term made up by some who are slightly envious of their current situation and who are desperate to be appreciated themselves?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I've noticed having a [good] fursuit seems to open doors to a world somewhat shut off to suitless-furs. Not necessarily an inherently "bad" thing, but certainly something that can be perceived as elitism.
Sometimes folk who just happen to be everywhere - at all the meets, on all the IRC channels, have a thousand fanboys praising their every last inane one-liner LJ post - could also be perceived an elite (although that sort of thing's a fine line between elitism and general cock).
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Generally I've always treat The Furry Elite to be a more perceptual grouping term applied to individual people matching certain characteristics, without being a proper fixed entity or group. Not necessarily someone who is good at a certain thing, but rather someone who thinks and acts as though they are above others because they *believe* themselves to be good at something (and more often than not such people actually aren't =:P).
The jealousy part I've always found tends to come more as a perception thing from the individual. Furries who tend to act complete cocks but have a large groups of fanbois following invariably close their eyes to their own faults (why agree the sky is blue, when 10 other people will agree with your assertion that it's pink?), thus put any criticism down to jealousy as it avoids the need to do much needed self-analysis.
(no subject)
no subject
I truly hope I fall into neither category.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I noticed this during one of the panels with the guests at EF14, for example. There was a discussion about writing, and someone - from the audience, I think, not one of the guests - remarked that while YiffStar had a hundred thousand stories, 99999 of them were crap, and the remaining one was stolen. There was some more talk along those lines, too - about how there were many people on FA as well who thought they were writers but - in the opinion of whoever said that - weren't actually.
If that's not elitism, I don't know what is.
But it's something that generally seems to be limited to a minority of folks.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
:P
Joking aside, r_a_blackpaws probably said it best, there's little to add.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)