"The Furry Elite"
Sep. 16th, 2008 12:25 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
At Eurofurence, I heard this phrase mentioned for the first time.
Does a furry elite exist or is it merely a perception?
Does it consist of furs who just happen to be good at what they do - be it performing, drawing or writing - and who are appreciated because of it?
Or is it just a term made up by some who are slightly envious of their current situation and who are desperate to be appreciated themselves?
Does a furry elite exist or is it merely a perception?
Does it consist of furs who just happen to be good at what they do - be it performing, drawing or writing - and who are appreciated because of it?
Or is it just a term made up by some who are slightly envious of their current situation and who are desperate to be appreciated themselves?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 11:37 pm (UTC)I've noticed having a [good] fursuit seems to open doors to a world somewhat shut off to suitless-furs. Not necessarily an inherently "bad" thing, but certainly something that can be perceived as elitism.
Sometimes folk who just happen to be everywhere - at all the meets, on all the IRC channels, have a thousand fanboys praising their every last inane one-liner LJ post - could also be perceived an elite (although that sort of thing's a fine line between elitism and general cock).
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:38 pm (UTC)Fanboys are always going to exist and I guess this is where the perception of the elite comes from. I guess it's whatever floats your boat though as some of the revered furs, I cannot see why people revere them so much. Yet others, who do other things, I have more appreciation for. However, I wonder if there is an aspect of institutional elitism going on as the same names do seem to crop up at all Furry Cons etc.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 11:13 pm (UTC)The former individuals lurk in the shadows. Things just happen. You never know who made events work out - or only pick up bits on the grapevine.
The latter persistently make a song and dance about what they are doing for or at a particular function.
(Of course this is just human nature - everything that happens in "the fandom" is ordinary human nature and no different to any other group of people, which is why I always wince a little when I find myself referencing "the fandom". We're no different to any other bunch of people and we shouldn't really reference ourselves as if to infer we're anything otherwise).
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 11:34 pm (UTC)It seems that everyones an artist these days too. LJ Meme's for con-goers asking if you do art trades, fur-fucking-affinity (for the life of me, I don't know why it's so popular) seems designed to share art between artists, but doesn't consider you may simply be a consumer of art with nothing oh any worth to put back. I don't want my FA account to have a gallery, artist info, etc. I feel like I just shouldn't be there.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 06:55 am (UTC)Generally I've always treat The Furry Elite to be a more perceptual grouping term applied to individual people matching certain characteristics, without being a proper fixed entity or group. Not necessarily someone who is good at a certain thing, but rather someone who thinks and acts as though they are above others because they *believe* themselves to be good at something (and more often than not such people actually aren't =:P).
The jealousy part I've always found tends to come more as a perception thing from the individual. Furries who tend to act complete cocks but have a large groups of fanbois following invariably close their eyes to their own faults (why agree the sky is blue, when 10 other people will agree with your assertion that it's pink?), thus put any criticism down to jealousy as it avoids the need to do much needed self-analysis.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:44 pm (UTC)As everyone is individual I guess they treat the concept of an "Elite" in different ways. Some revel in the fact that they are highly appreciated and are arrogant because of it yet others spurn the attention because they do not believe to be more capable or better at something than others. Then you have the fanboys who do exasperate the situation more. What interests me is that the same names often crop up in furry cons etc and I am intrigued as to why this is. This isn't fanboyism, this goes further.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 07:57 am (UTC)I truly hope I fall into neither category.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 12:25 pm (UTC)I call myself elite just for the pisstake lulz it generates LOL
Just like 'Brumcon - The yearly con for elitist bastards twice a year'.
Nope, Brumcon is a pisstake name for a large house party, thats all it is hehe.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 08:05 am (UTC)I noticed this during one of the panels with the guests at EF14, for example. There was a discussion about writing, and someone - from the audience, I think, not one of the guests - remarked that while YiffStar had a hundred thousand stories, 99999 of them were crap, and the remaining one was stolen. There was some more talk along those lines, too - about how there were many people on FA as well who thought they were writers but - in the opinion of whoever said that - weren't actually.
If that's not elitism, I don't know what is.
But it's something that generally seems to be limited to a minority of folks.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 09:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:47 pm (UTC)I haven't read much of YiffStar but anything that is too porn orientated simply isn't my thing. However, I am sure there are good writers on there, I can just imagine it may be a case of filtering through the crap.
However, I would never disparage anyone who has gone out there and given it ago. If you write (or draw, or perform etc) you are putting yourself on the line to a point as you are naturally going to be judged. Fair play to all those who go out there and do it - that's the thing I respect above anything else.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 10:58 pm (UTC)Of course, there is such a thing as technical merit, and some people really do not exactly rank very high in that regard, but that's not a reason to disparage them, either. (And it's not like anyone was born with the ability to write brilliant prose, anyway...)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 09:35 am (UTC):P
Joking aside, r_a_blackpaws probably said it best, there's little to add.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 11:21 am (UTC)I used to play this on my BBC-B. Infact, I still have the boxed game complete with maps somewhere. I think that's going to be the next thing to bring over from Kent!
More on topic, it is a bit of both. There are furs out there who choose to only interact with those they think are worthy of their presence - true elitists - and there are plenty of others who use the term out of jealousy.
Me? I couldn't give a rat's either way. Nothing that happens more than 2 miles from the beach is of any great conscequence. Unless it's a tidal wave.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:50 pm (UTC)You are right in your assessment, I feel. I know a few fanboys who are desperately clamouring to be accepted and then I know a few of the elites who look down on you (and have looked down on me in the past) because of the fursuit I have, for who I am etc etc.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:48 pm (UTC)I agree, he put it rather expertly and succinctly. I guess it's all down to the individuals involved at the end of the day - either on the subject or the perceiver.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 03:10 pm (UTC)I dont like it either, but i think im just exhibiting geek social fallacy 3, 4 or 5...hmm not sure..
http://www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 03:16 pm (UTC)I agree with you about it being the case in most social situations. It's what I have experienced too.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:53 pm (UTC)I don't think that these people necessarily completely turn their backs on the "lesser beings" but there is, amongst a few, a mentality of arrogance that relates to the fact that they *know* they are good. Personally, I have no problem with people being good at something and I respect them for it but when it seeps into arrogance and being a twat, then there comes a point where any feelings of balance are wiped out.
Everyone has something to contribute to the Fandom, just like everyone has something to contribute in life itself. I don't see any point in elitism and I believe everyone should get a chance to shine.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 11:22 pm (UTC)You just reminded me of a bad experience at my first FC (2006). I was sitting out by the pool, fiddling with my camera, when somebody shouts in pidgin-English from a group of people nearby (with the odd fursuit) "NO PICTURES! NO CAMERA!"
I wasn't even shooting anything. Put a bit of a downer on the rest of the con, and my camera didn't come out much again for fear of more uppity suiters. THAT'S an example of elitism - attend a convention as busy and dense as FC and start yelling at strangers "NO PICTURES!" who weren't even shooting any. Sheesh. (Fortunately in 2008, I didn't encounter that sort of up-ones-own-arse attitude from anyone, in or out of suit.)
That, and reading before now on the odd individuals LJ about "rules" concerning their fursuit, which essentially boil down to don't come near me if I don't know you, still make me afraid to approach anyone in suit. I fully respect peoples personal space and wishes, but posting strict rules about conduct when in suit is, to me, the highest form of elitism. Why go to a massive furry convention in suit, in public if you're THAT angsty about being touched or admired? I really can't understand that one.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-17 11:57 pm (UTC)Often difficult to identify the suits you recognise in a huge crowd though. Most suiters are very open and bouncy, I get this, but not knowing any of them very well, someone like myself on the outside just has no idea whos friendly and who isn't. I prefer to admire from a shortish distance (god, I hope that doesn't appear creepy, now that I think about it).
Still, I have a zillion pics from the last FC, including lovely photogenic dances as nobody minded and nearly everyone else had their dSLR's out anyway! I will process the several hundred RAW images in the next few days.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-18 12:10 am (UTC)http://d.furaffinity.net/art/xavierrottweiler/1218336507.xavierrottweiler_p1010026.jpg
Or
http://d.furaffinity.net/art/xavierrottweiler/1173908198.xavierrottweiler_1.jpg
no subject
Date: 2008-09-18 12:13 am (UTC)*goes limp and dreamy, thinking of buff rotties*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-18 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-18 12:33 am (UTC)