lupestripe: (Default)
[personal profile] lupestripe
The BNP gain two seats (largely thanks to the media scaremongering actually giving them publicity and thus being counter-productive) whilst UKIP have made significant gains too.

In fact, it has been a great day for Eurosceptics and parties on the far right throughout Europe. This tells me something - either people are widely opposed to the EU or the EU needs a massive overhaul in the way it is governed and administered. From my own point of view, I sincerely hope it's the latter rather than the former (I think if managed correctly, the EU can be a fantastic thing) but sadly, I fear it's not.

To me, the results of this election are merely one more reason to leave the country as I am becoming increasingly disenfranchised with where this country is heading (although, I accept, the local elections couldn't have really gone better really from my own standpoint).

Still, that's the delight of democracy I suppose. I just wish that the media had delivered all of the facts as I certainly did not see balanced reporting or indeed any real discussion or debate on the options that each political party presented forth. People were just too obsessed with the far right. And look at what we got.

In fact, the only articles I read in the Press were about the dangers of the far right - and all that did was give them publicity. Indeed, the BNP's policies were the only ones I didn't have to search for when I was trying to make my mind up on who to vote. In some ways, I wonder whether the rise of the far right is what the media actually wants - indeed the timing of the expenses scandal was certainly interesting regarding these elections.

P.S. I have always believed that every election is important and should not just be used as a "protest vote". I have always believed that not voting for who you truly believe in is counterproductive and damaging to democracy.

Date: 2009-06-08 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] balto-mike.livejournal.com
I personally think we should be a hell of lot more alarmed if they were elected MPs than MEPs. However I understand that the signal of electing these two candiates might try to make the BNP seem more mainstream, but I still believe that the majority of people do not want them to become mainstream.

The EU personally, I think its 'superstate' powers should be cut down, I appericate that it has some (but not many) good laws for the whole continent and that its free trade has benefited our economies well. However there is little coverage here and often the anti-EU message gets by a lot stronger. Certainly perhaps a reform of the Parliamentary system might do it some favours. What's going on with Lisbon Treaty anyway atm?

Finally, there are other fringe/extreme parties with a tiny number of MEPs at Brussels, so its not just a problem faced by the UK.

Date: 2009-06-08 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lupestripe.livejournal.com
In a way, the BNP being elected is one of the major drawbacks of PR but I guess it is a more democratic system. Of course, I'd be more worried if it was in the UK as there is a neo-right element of the European parliament as it is.

There are far too many anti-EU messages in this country and little redress from the other side. At the moment, the pros and cons of being in the EU are largely equal but if reformed, the EU could be a truly great thing. This bias in the media is the main reason why I am opposed to any referenda as it will simply be a result of who can shout the loudest.

I think EU law and UK law could be symbiotic and could work together, with neither one trumping the other. If that reform happens, the national sovereignty argument will go.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
8 91011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 08:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios